« FX Renews The Great SONS OF ANARCHY For A Third Season | Main | Build Your CF Moto Bike Into A Way Cool Trike For Cheap »

Every Good Boy Deserves Payment; My Dispute With A London Lookalike Talent Agency

Yesterday, I found a snotty little Email in my inbox from a London based talent agency, Splitting Images(which is a name ripped-off from a popular UK TV show, btw). This company is the talent agency for a large number of small-time UK actors who impersonate famous public figures such as actors, celebrities and politicians. Strangely, while this business rips off the public likeness of celebrities for profit by using lookalike actors, it feels that it's actors are immune to critical review. A Michael Fine from Splitting Images either demanded payment from me or the removal of the photos of actors under contract from Splitting Images. This is an outrageous demand.

Of all the movie, book, DVD, Cd, or entertainment reviews that I've done, never once have any of the reviewed subjects ever once demanded some payment for the free promotion or review of their products. And despite the fact that it's pretty obvious that on the Wizbang network, more than 35 million hits have been recorded by the website meter, which is pretty darn nice free publicity, promotion and advertising for any reviewed product, Splitting Images somehow feels that they are special and entitled to special fees from me to write a critical review of their performers. Absolutely ridiculous.

It's also pretty obvious that many of their performers are used in commercials, TV or movies as a joke or for humor value. Yet, folks like Michael Fine seem to take themselves way too seriously and not be in on the joke. His absurd demand Email to either remove the entertainer review photos or else pay Splitting Images money is total crap. Fair use allows a product under critical review to have an illustration photo of some type.

Splitting Images in the UK also doesn't seem to have a clue that American law gives wider constitutional protections to comedy as well "fair use" gives writers some leeway to use images when they write critical reviews of products or entertainment if no other image exists. My celebrity lookalike pieces were pretty funny with a lot of humor as well as a critical review of the performance of the entertainers. If the entertainers were good, I noted it. That's darn good publicity for those entertainers. But in other cases, where the impersonation performance just wasn't very good, I joked about it in my review that was wide open to public comment. Splitting Images or the entertainers certainly had the right to post a comment, yet none did.

Today, I would have just loved to write a funny piece about one of Splitting Images entertainers who they send out to portray Tiger Woods. He doesn't very much look like Tiger Woods to me, personally. And he has a hint of a mustache. Who ever knew that Tiger Woods had a mustache? Just sending some kid out as "Tiger Woods" with a faint mustache doesn't really impress me very much. It's nonsense. It deserves a bad critical review.

NO%20PHOTO%20AVAILABLE.jpg

In other cases, Splitting Images sends out some pretty convincing impersonators such as UK actor Max Frudd who does a really good Ringo Starr impression. Frudd has a funny name, but his Ringo look is dead-on. However, whether or not he can sing or play drums as good as Ringo isn't noted on the Splitting Images site. Do their entertainers mere just look a little like the celebrities? Or, can they actually perform? That's a big question for me that remains unanswered.

I hope the good entertainers from Splitting Images get more work as a result of my reviews. And as far as the dispute that I'm having with the Splitting Images agency, I haven't yet heard back as a result of my Email responses to them. Splitting Images entertainers got plenty of free good publicity as a result of the Progressive Values and Wizbang Pop pieces. Critics and reviewers can't be forced to pay royalties to some company like Splitting Images just to do a critical review of their entertainers. That was an outrageous request on their part.

Splitting Images makes me pretty angry. Entertainment reviewers like myself who write reviews should not be forced to pay to write product or entertainment reviews. I don't know where this thing is headed. But I'll write the editor of Wizbang Pop and follow his directions on the matter. I promise to update as this story progresses, but it seems like it's always the small time operations like Splitting Images which are always the biggest pain in the ass it seems.

  • Currently 3/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 3/5 (1 votes cast)


Close

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


AddThis Feed Button

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://wizbangpop.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/37499

Comments (2)

"Splitting Images someh... (Below threshold)
Marc:

"Splitting Images somehow feels that they are special and entitled to special fees from me to write a critical review of their performers. Absolutely ridiculous."

Is it, are you sure? Your answer may be contained earlier in your piece:

"A Michael Fine from Splitting Images either demanded payment from me or the removal of the photos of actors under contract from Splitting Images. This is an outrageous demand."

Not outrageous if you published copyrighted photos without permission, given your past history of "selective editing," I'd be far from surprised if you left out that fact.

Here's the deal, Marc. I wr... (Below threshold)
Paul Hooson:

Here's the deal, Marc. I write reviews of movies, books, Cds, DVDs and other performances. I wrote some funny reviews of some UK personality impersonators, and then essentially the talent agent for a number of impersonators, acting without their consent, acted to stop my review of their performances by requesting that I seek permission and offer him payment to post any photos in my review of their performances. This is outrageous. Roger Ebert has never been charged money to review a movie. ROLLING STONE has never been charged to review an album. But this little talent agency wanted to charge me an outrageous sum just for the privilege of writing reviews about some small time entertainers under contract with them. These aren't even major celebrities, just small time actors I'm talking about.

The fact of the matter is that I receive Emails everyday from people or stories that people want written about on Wizbang Pop because the Wizbang network is so popular and has had over 35 million hits so far since Kevin founded it. Those small time entertainers would have received massive free publicity from my reviews far away from the mere handful of persons who ever bother to read the obscure website set up by the talent agent. My reviews of their performances was a golden opportunity for exposure and more work. But the greedy little talent agency took that away from them because they wanted to charge me to use photos of their performers in my review. So I said screw it, and removed the photos.

These entertainers need to seriously find another talent agent; one who seriously looks for work for them, not screws them out of free publicity opportunities for work.


Post a comment


Advertisments






Follow Wizbang Pop!

Wizbang Pop! on Facebook Follow Wizbang Pop! on Twitter Subscribe to Wizbang Pop! feed

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

poptips@wizbangblog.com

Around The Celebrisphere

SHAUNA SAND SHOWS OFF NEW MAN….IS A SECOND SEX TAPE IN THE WORKS? [Faded Youth Blog]

EVA LONGORIA CELEBRATES $1 MILLION AT&T DONATION [Faded Youth Blog]

Rihanna in Sunday magazine/Rude Boy may be the last Rated R single [Oh No They Didn't!]

Peter Facinelli Is A Busy, Busy Man [Socialite Life]

David Beckham Hops in The Tub with Smithy [Just Jared]

Noot Seear swears Terry Richardson is a good guy [Oh No They Didn't!]

Girls Aloud's Nuhdeen Coyle speaks on rift rumours with Cheryl Cole. [Oh No They Didn't!]

hobo post [Oh No They Didn't!]

David Beckham Hops in The Tub with Smithy [Oh No They Didn't!]

ABC Family Deathly Hallows Sneak Peek [Oh No They Didn't!]

Brunch Break! [Oh No They Didn't!]

Jim Carrey tweets about his grandson [Oh No They Didn't!]

Kim Kardashian Shows Off A Little Crack In Miami [Obvious Observations] [Socialite Life]

Pics of Kim Kardashian's Bikini Yacht Afternoon With Kourtney! [PopSugar]

Strolling and Rolling [Pic Of The Day] [Gawker]

Put That Celeb Together [I'm Not Obsessed]

Ronald Shane Modica: Michelle McGee’s Ex-husband [Right Celebrity]

Biggest Loser Romance: Sam Poueu and Stephanie Anderson (PHOTOS) [Bitten and Bound]

Tea Party Protesters Call Black and Gay Lawmakers 'Nigger' and 'Faggot' [Idiots] [Gawker]

JENNIFER LOVE HEWITT GETS A NEW POST BREAK-UP‘DO [Faded Youth Blog]

Katherine Heigl Wardrobe Malfunction [Bitten and Bound]

Leonardo DiCaprio: Here We Go Lakers, Here We Go! [Just Jared]

Jason Wahler F*cks Up Again, Second Arrest In One Week [Socialite Life]

Jen Garner Gives Violet A Smile Before School [X17 Online]

Categories

Archives

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Section Editor: Tracey Coyle

Contributors: Paul Hooson, Adam Stone

All original content copyright © 2003-2009 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark. Wizbang Pop™ is a trademark of Wizbang®, LLC.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Site Meter


Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice