On November 4, Chrysler will announce some controversial plans to revamp the company phasing out many Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep models, and slowly introducing many Fiat designed products into the company's new product lineup. Chrysler intends to continue it's appeal to high performance buyers on the one hand, while adding many new European styled models in hopes of extending the company's appeal on the other hand. However, some auto analysts are highly critical of Chrysler's plans. Some experts feel that the company will have more than enough problems trying not to lose more market share, let alone expand it at all by bringing in a new customer base for the Fiat designed products.
For at least the next two years. Chrysler will largely attempt to market their existing line of models, however an updated Jeep Grand Cherokee and a new version of the Chrysler 300 will be marketed next year. But many existing models will be phased out by 2012, and these include the Chrysler PT Cruiser, Chrysler Sebring, Chrysler Town and Country, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Nitro, Dodge Avenger, and the Jeep Compass and Patriot SUV models. What will remain is a core of high performance cars, sport utility vehicles and the new Fiat products. Chrysler will also bring in some Alfa Romeo products in 2012 and 2013.
However, one possible major problem for Chrysler might be that Fiat and Alfa Romeo products have always had a troubled history of very poor U.S. sales. Further, many Fiat and Alfa Romeo products haven't been held in very high regard by many American consumers in the past, even though Alfa Romeo is certainly a higher priced brand. Fiat and Alfa Romeo have had the very same problems that Renault has had with American consumers, poor U.S. market penetration. Can American consumers be taught to buy brands that they don't want to buy? Unlike many upstart Asian brands which seem to always capture a decent hold on the American market, many older European brands such as Fiat just never seem to capture any decent hold on market share in the U.S. and have quit the states before.
Another serious problem for bringing European models into the states is a very unfavorable dollar vs. Euro exchange rate. As the American dollar loses more value, and the Euro and other European currencies rise in value, Fiat and Alfa Romeo products might just find themselves priced uncompetitively compared to Asian models or other domestic offerings.
Chrysler's hope is that their future might be brighter. However, the reality is that their company has heavily banked on trucks and sport utility vehicles at a time in which rising fuel prices and a tight economy have boosted smaller car sales. In the late 1970's, Chrysler nearly went bankrupt at that time by marketing too many big cars, when GM had the little Vega, Ford the Pinto, and little AMC the Gremlin and Hornet cars. Chrysler needed a government bailout to survive back then and to develop the line of small cars like the Omni and Horizon and the K-car designed line. This past year, Chrysler found itself once again asking for government help. But the government strongly encouraged Chrysler to accept Fiat as a partner although Fiat isn't really giving Chrysler any money, just products, technology and management skills. Fiat is certainly hedging their bet with Chrysler despite a 20% ownership share in the company.
Will this near shotgun marriage between Chrysler and Fiat, largely arranged by government regulators save Chrysler, or just be a final chapter for the company? Last year, Chrysler had a 11.1% market share. This year that market share declined down to just 8.3%. Much more of a decline and Chrysler could be gone for good.

Comments (3)
Sadly I suspect Chrysler is... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Paul | October 28, 2009 12:42 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sadly I suspect Chrysler is doomed. GM might make it but Chrysler is simply in disarray.
As part of my job I am in contact with dozens of autodealers and the Chrysler dealers are all on the edge of oblivion.
While GM had a large mountian to climb itself, at least it has a map and a compass (so to speak) Chrysler from the top down is just wandering thru the woods.
1. Posted by Paul | October 28, 2009 12:42 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 28, 2009 00:42
2. Posted by JLawson | October 28, 2009 7:51 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Fiat...
Well, I had one in the late '70s. It ran, that's about the best thing you could say for it. I'd look at one if I were in the market for a new car, but I'd be pretty reluctant to buy one. (Although splicing together a BROKEN nylon brake fluid reservoir using a lighter to melt the edges was educational from an auto maintenance standpoint, there being no dealership anywhere near that I could get the part, I'd prefer not to do it again.)
2. Posted by JLawson | October 28, 2009 7:51 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 28, 2009 07:51
3. Posted by Mycroft | October 28, 2009 9:45 AM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Well, I for one applaud dropping the PT Cruiser line - talk about ugly.
And they are not dropping the Caravan line - which is their big seller. (I own a Voyager and a Grand Caravan and the Voyager is due for replacement next summer).
I remember FIAT - "Fix It Again Tony" - right along with FORD - "Found On Road Dead". And GM - well, my one try at Chevy years ago - never again.....
Time for a new upstart who brings quality to the table, and reasonable prices.
3. Posted by Mycroft | October 28, 2009 9:45 AM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 28, 2009 09:45